Dear Readers---
European Union laws require me to give European Union visitors
information about cookies used on my blog. In many cases, these laws
also require me to obtain consent.
As a courtesy, Google has added a notice on my blog to explain Google's use of certain Blogger
and Google cookies, including use of Google Analytics and AdSense
cookies.
That's it. Please carry on.
Wednesday, November 8, 2017
Monday, August 12, 2013
Cincinnati Pioneers “Health Coaching” Program in Partnership with Kroger
by
LAS
The
City of Cincinnati partnered with Kroger and Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield of Ohio to run a pilot program for 600 employees and retirees.
The programs offer “health coaches” in Heart Healthy Coaching and
Diabetes Coaching for some amazing results.
The
enrollees were compared to a control group and saw statistically
significant results. Enrollees were better at adhering to
medications, and blood pressure dropped 4 percent. Kroger's clinical
development manager stated that just a 2 percent drop in BP can mean
a 10 percent drop in stroke deaths.
Emergency
room visits dropped 40 percent with the group in the Heart Health
program, compared to the general population. Participants in the
Diabetes Coaching program saw an astonishing 90 percent drop in
cardiovascular-related ER visits.
Those
who did not participate in the program saw total cardiovascular
medical costs triple, compared to a drop of 11 percent for the
enrollees.
A
carrot was held out to participants in the form of deep discounts on
their medications as long as they were active in the coaching
program. Co-pays were waived.
The
first visit with a coach typically lasted an hour, when the patient
declared what their goals were, and the coach started to guide them
through the kinds of decisions they were making.
Many
times, an enrollee would meet with a dietician who would walk the
participant through the grocery aisle and help her decode food labels
so she could make smarter choices. Sometimes the pharmacist is the
coach for someone who has several medications or has questions or
concerns.
As
of 2012, Kroger was exploring whether it could expand the program to
other chronic conditions such as asthma or chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease. Kroger rolled out the program to all 17 of its
Cincinnati-area stores. Meantime, the City of Cincinnati is looking
for other claims and pharmacy data that could show whether the
program is succeeding or not, and by how much.
Labels:
chronic conditions,
cincinnati,
health coach,
healthcare,
kroger
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Telemedicine Cutting Costs of Health-care While Improving Outcomes
by
LAS
The
innovation of offering telemedicine – where patients contact their
doctors by phone, email or online – is not only helping shave the
cost of health-care but is also helping patients manage ongoing
health problems more successfully.
Employers
and insurers are both hopeful that telemedicine will potentially keep
more patients out of the emergency rooms who do not need that level
of care.
Often
patients go the ER because they have no other options, either they
have no insurance or no local urgent care clinic or the clinic is
closed at that hour that they need it. So telemedicine is really
offering a medical advice service that is on-call 24/7.
It
may shock you to learn that in 2009, there were 136 MILLION
emergency room visits, and that at least 20 percent (and by some
measures as much as three-quarters of them) could have been properly
treated either in a clinic by their primary-care provider or in an
urgent care facility. Given that the average ER visit costs at least
$1,400, channeling those visits into other options has a high
priority.
The
good news is that telemedicine is getting rave reviews from users,
never mind the insurers. Upwards of 90 percent of patients who used
telemedicine gave it a positive approval rating.
One
such telemedicine provider is STAT Doctors in the Scottsdale, Arizona
area. Scottsdale began offering the telemedicine option and began
seeing benefits: lower costs of course, but also decreased
absenteeism.
Many
employers offer call-a-nurse services as part of their healthcare
plan. If more employees took advantage of that service, maybe a true
form of telemedicine with access to physician consultations would be
deployed.
Looking
ahead, applications designed for wireless home-based health care
services and advice is expected to grow from a $304 million-dollar
market to $4.4 BILLION by the end of this year.
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Four Medical Tests for Women Over 50; Four Medical Tests for Men Over 50
by
LAS
Dr.
Oz has been promoting the value of four basic medical tests for men
and women age 50 and over to catch the most serious health problems
early.
FOR
MEN--
1-
A PSA test. Recommended on an annual basis for men age 50 and
over. You might get the test at age 50 just for a baseline reading,
but Dr. Oz still feels that annual testing provides essential
information for your healthcare provider.
2-
Colonoscopy. Colon cancer is the third most common cancer in men.
3-
Hearing test. Going to the audiologist is recommended especially
for men, who more often work with power tools, jackhammers, or in
noisy environments. Hearing loss affects about a third of adults over
age 65, and almost half of all men over 75. Tinnitus (ringing in the
ears) is also a reason to see your doctor.
4-
Not a single medical test, but a head-to-toe skin check to catch
changes in moles or other abnormalities that can signal skin cancer.
FOR
WOMEN--
1-
Bone Scan-- Osteoporosis can lead to bone fractures particularly
in women past menopause. If you are identified as having a
bone-thinning disease, you may elect to take bisphosphonates to curb
further bone loss. Other approaches such as weight-bearing exercises
or dietary changes can also fend off further bone loss.
2-
Colonoscopy-- Colon Cancer kills more women than ovarian, uterine
and cervical cancer combined. Testing can start at age 50, though you
only need to take it once every decade.
3-
Mammogram-- A baseline test is suggested at age 40, then annual
tests after age 50. Your doctor may want annual tests earlier than
that if you have had any family history of breast cancer.
4-
Pap Smear Test-- Annual testing is suggested for most women of
any age. You could elect to drop this test after age 65, though,
since one's risk drops off greatly after that if you have had mostly
clean screenings.
Labels:
dr oz,
for men,
for women,
medical test,
ounce of prevention,
screening
Friday, August 9, 2013
Smokers Cost Employers $12K More Per Year (each) than Non-smokers
by
LAS
Studies
show that each smoker costs a company an average of $12,000 a year
more than non-smokers. Inspired by a California study that showed
every dollar spent by the state on smoking-cessation programs saved
$18 in health care costs – more employers are moving to start
smoke-free policies or tobacco-cessation programs in the workplace.
Employers
do have to skirt some smokers' rights laws in a few states to avoid
discrimination lawsuits if they become too invasive.
In
just 29 states, the employers are limited to prohibiting smoking in
the workplace, and states may prohibit smoking in public places. They
have what is called “lifestyle laws” that protect workers.
Employers may not take smoking into account regarding promotions,
hiring or firing.
These
laws, one must admit, are pretty toothless. It is difficult to prove
that an employer violated the law because they know enough to provide
some other, innocuous reason for not hiring or promoting someone.
Some
of the state laws are even weaker. The Virginia law apply only to
state employees. Three states – Minnesota, Illinois, and Montana –
protect smokers rights but allow employers to charge higher premiums
for the smokers. Three states – Tennessee, Louisiana, and Colorado
– apply their protection of smokers to future hires, not current
employees (when the law was passed).
Smokers
who try to quit generally have to make many attempts before it
sticks. Statistically, it takes seven attempts for a smoker to quit
smoking. So keeping trying, you never know what approach will finally
help you reach your goal.
Labels:
employers,
healthcare costs,
insurance,
nonsmokers,
smokers,
smokers rights
Thursday, August 8, 2013
More Than Two-thirds of ER Visits Avoidable, Says Study
by
LAS
A
recent study by Truven Health Analytics found that 72 percent of
emergency room visits were avoidable, and could have been safely
treated by a primary care provider. Truven drew upon a database of 24
million patients.
Healthcare
situations were broken down into four categories of urgency. Category
One is Non-emergent; medical care was not required within 12 hours.
Category
Two is Emergent – Primary-Care Treatable; medical care was required
within 12 hours but could have safely been delivered in a primary
care setting (that is, in a clinic office).
Category
Three is Emergent, (preventable or avoidable); this means that the
patient needed medical care within 12 hours, for could have been
prevented with effective office visits. An example of the latter
would be someone who had diabetes or high-blood pressure who was not
taking their medication as advised, and suddenly had a sudden event
such as a stroke.
Category
Four is Emergent (not preventable or avoidable); these are the kinds
of events that people normally associate with an ER visit – a child
falls out of a tree, someone is a victim of a car accident or
shooting, someone is hit by a softball in a game, a homeowner falls
off the roof, etc.
Some
events were split between two categories, such as “abdominal pain,
unspecified site” since there is a 33 percent chance of it being a
serious problem requiring emergency treatment and a 67 percent chance
of being something that could be looked at in your doctor's office.
The
good news that only 6 percent of patients had an event that could
have been prevented with proper primary care. That suggests that
people are taking existing conditions seriously, taking their
medicine, and making sensible lifestyle decisions.
Almost
half (42 percent) could have been acceptably treated by their primary
care provider. No reason was floated for why patients did not go to
their physicians. Possibly they felt they could not get into a
treatment room in a timely fashion.
One
quarter had serious conditions but did not require treatment within
12 hours. Presumably they could have gotten into their primary care
provider within that time, or gone to an urgent care center.
When
broken down by age, it was shocking to see that three-quarters of the
visits by children age four and under were of a nature that should
have been seen in a primary care setting. Whether the parents had
health-care coverage for minors was not addressed in this report. But
still, these health events should have been seen in a primary care
setting by a pediatrician who was familiar with the child's
background.
Steering
patients to the proper non-ER setting would by itself create huge
cost savings for not only insurers but the patients, who presumably
would have come up with much larger copays for an ER visit.
Labels:
avoidable,
emergency room,
hospital,
study,
unnecessary
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Gee, Does Medical Tourism Mean I Can Go To Appleton???
by
LAS
I
ran across a mention that a hip replacement costs only about $27,000
in Appleton, Wisconsin, while it can cost as much as $126,000 in a
major metro area such as Houston, Texas. Why the disparity?
Obviously
wide variations in income levels between major metro areas and
smaller towns are a big factor. But also the fact that the hospital
has to pay much higher property taxes and other expenses in a big
city is another major factor. It may also have to buy another lot to
build a parking structure on for patients and visitors, while the
small town has free street parking.
The
small town hospital might also sacrifice some frills, too.
Labels:
cost comparison,
hospital bills,
hospital costs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)