Arizona is one state that has made it clear it wants no part of a national healthcare plan. It has refused other federal programs before, so this is not a sudden policy change.
EXCERPT: Right on the heels of a successful state-by-state nullification of the 2005 Real ID act, the State of Arizona is out in the forefront of a growing resistance to proposed federal health care legislation.
This past Monday, the Arizona State Senate voted 18-11 to concur with the House and approve the Health Care Freedom Act (HCR2014). This will put a proposal on the 2010 ballot which would constitutionally override any law, rule or regulation that requires individuals or employers to participate in any particular health care system.
HCR2014, if approved by voters next year, also would prohibit any fine or penalty on anyone or any company for deciding to purchase health care directly. Doctors and health care providers would remain free to accept those funds and provide those services.
Finally, it would overrule anything that prohibits the sale of private health insurance in Arizona.
Five other states — Indiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota and Wyoming — are considering similar initiatives for their 2010 ballots.
You may read the whole article at this forum page: http://usfreestar.newsvine.com/_news/2009/06/26/2972841-arizona-hcr2012-national-health-care-nullification -- We has lots of good discussions on this site so you might want to browse awhile.
Showing posts with label proposal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label proposal. Show all posts
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
If You Depend on Your Employer for Health Ins., Don't Vote McCain
Hi, --
I don't generally talk about politics at all on this site. However, there are some clear differences between the two major presidential candidates when it comes down to how your health insurance will be affected.
It is already pretty clear that Sen. John McCain has plans to torpedo employer-paid health insurance coverage. How can a president do that? Pretty easy if he is able to push thru a proposed elimination of the tax break for the employer.
Currently the only way that employers are able to offer group coverage at all is because of the tax exclusion employer-paid health insurance.
Ostensibly the goal is to push individuals into state-run pools. But that means that individuals will have to pay 100% of their premiums, whereas now they pay anywhere from 20% to 50%. Some employers do not contribute anything now; they just sign up with an outside administrator like Administaff and let employees pick and choose what they need. And pay 100% of the cost.
Americans are being squeezed between spiraling increases in food bills, gas prices, and often in their mortgages if they got caught in the mortgage credit crunch. Where are they going to get the extra dollars to pay for 100% of their health insurance coverage too? AND pay income taxes on the benefits from your insurance plan??? Are they crazy???Here's a link to a great article on the changes being proposed; this is part one of a two-parter. I hope you benefit from reading it.
HEADLINE: McCain's Health Care Plan: Gut Employer-Based Insurance
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/93734/?page=entire
An Excerpt: So far, the press has failed to examine what's at stake here for workers and their bosses -- that, in the long run, employer coverage could disappear, and that, in the short run, they may have to pay taxes on some portion of their health benefits, no matter who wins in November. In effect, it's an unspoken tax increase which has yet to surface in campaign conversation.
I don't generally talk about politics at all on this site. However, there are some clear differences between the two major presidential candidates when it comes down to how your health insurance will be affected.
It is already pretty clear that Sen. John McCain has plans to torpedo employer-paid health insurance coverage. How can a president do that? Pretty easy if he is able to push thru a proposed elimination of the tax break for the employer.
Currently the only way that employers are able to offer group coverage at all is because of the tax exclusion employer-paid health insurance.
Ostensibly the goal is to push individuals into state-run pools. But that means that individuals will have to pay 100% of their premiums, whereas now they pay anywhere from 20% to 50%. Some employers do not contribute anything now; they just sign up with an outside administrator like Administaff and let employees pick and choose what they need. And pay 100% of the cost.
Americans are being squeezed between spiraling increases in food bills, gas prices, and often in their mortgages if they got caught in the mortgage credit crunch. Where are they going to get the extra dollars to pay for 100% of their health insurance coverage too? AND pay income taxes on the benefits from your insurance plan??? Are they crazy???Here's a link to a great article on the changes being proposed; this is part one of a two-parter. I hope you benefit from reading it.
HEADLINE: McCain's Health Care Plan: Gut Employer-Based Insurance
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/93734/?page=entire
An Excerpt: So far, the press has failed to examine what's at stake here for workers and their bosses -- that, in the long run, employer coverage could disappear, and that, in the short run, they may have to pay taxes on some portion of their health benefits, no matter who wins in November. In effect, it's an unspoken tax increase which has yet to surface in campaign conversation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
