In other words, do well-off seniors have the right to have Medicare pay for procedures that they could afford to pay out of pocket? And would this really help Medicare’s financial predicament anyway?
From someone called
the Happy Hospitalist believes that it is time to “say No” to seniors. “No to dialysis. No to life support. No to elective procedures [which would include artifical hips and knees] . No to brand name drugs. No to the latest expensive technology. We will have to place greater weight on quality of life over quantity of life. We will have to demand hospice care in futile situations. We will have to demand palliative comfort over slice and dice. We will have to reject marginally effective proceduralization and imaging of our elderly. We have to. We don’t have a choice. There is no other way.”
When I look at this list I agree on some items. “Futile care” is clearly unnecessary care. But often, we don’t know whether or not it will be futile. Every day elderly people do emerge from ICUs and go home to play with their grandchildren. As for “brand new drugs,” and “the latest expensive technology” regular readers know that I believe that everything depends on whether the new technologies have been tested and proven effective. We cannot afford to squander Medicare dollars on drugs, devices and procedures without knowing whether the patient will benefit. And I certainly prefer palliative care over “let’s try another surgery. Can’t do any harm.” (Except to the patient who suffers through it).
I agree with some measures but not others. Maybe all these joint replacements are unnecessary because we have been going about it all wrong. But cataract surgery keeps seniors active and involved and self-sufficient -- those are good things, dammit.
http://www.healthbeatblog.org/2008/08/do-seniors-have.html#more
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment